Perhaps SerpentZa is ill-equipped for a proper debate of the minds.
It looks as though Daniel Dumbrill over estimated SerpentZa, believing the Youtuber SerpentZa would be willing to have an unscripted adult conversation.
Let’s have a live debate @serpentza— Daniel Dumbrill (@DanielDumbrill) February 15, 2021
I’ll argue: China’s rise, even with it’s current government, is an overwhelming positive for it’s own people & the world, and that you’re racist.
You argue: China’s government is a net negative for it’s people & the world, and I’m racist. https://t.co/pkpFqgjXpD
SerpentZa quickly resorted to the usual name-calling and posted a picture of a homeless person in china instead. We can’t say we are surprised SerpentZa lacks the ability to debate what he spews freely online.
For SerpentZa, Having a live debate would be different from the selective editing he routinely showcases on his youtube channel.
The truth is the most difficult thing for most people to swallow, good or bad, there are uncomfortable facts about us all and our surroundings, being harassed and insulted in an attempt to get me to debate a psychopath however only strengthens my resolve to not engage. pic.twitter.com/9ZL6AZlmsh— Winston Sterzel (@serpentza) February 18, 2021
Today, people have a right to defend their ideas via discussion or debate. Perhaps someone challenging SerpentZa about his anti-China views is too much for the YouTuber. Or it could be much more simple than that… He is profiting from his anti china views and doesn’t want to ruin a good thing if he’s exposed during a live debate.